<html>
<body>
<font face="Courier New, Courier" size=3>Mr Kaufman,<br><br>
You have spread libelous information about me by your posting information
(attached below) to the BWNA mailing list. <br><br>
As anyone who knows me should know, I would not make a number of the
statements found there, especially the racist statement found on that
blog. I am surprised that you believed it was a genuine site, especially
in view of the racist statement.<br><br>
To repeat:<br>
This is NOT MY WEB SITE -- I had no part what so ever in the
creation or posating of this web site.<br><br>
I have asked the host to remove this site. If it is not removed soon, I
will be taking legal action. Hopefully such action will not need to
include you.<br><br>
To be clear: <br><br>
THIS IS A DEMAND THAT YOU IMMEDIATELY cease spreading the lies found on
that site, including its existence in any context that implies it has any
legitimate connection to me. <br><br>
Further I demand that you immediately contact anyone that you have
previously contacted about that site and make it clear that I have NO
CONNECTION WHAT SO EVER with this site.<br><br>
The very fact that you included a racist quote in your posting to BWNA
indicates some intent to defame me. Don't make it worse by
continuing.<br><br>
I should mention that few things on the Internet are really anonymous and
the person behind this fraud will soon be discovered and forced to pay a
price through the legal system.<br><br>
Thanks<br>
JK<br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
At 11:02 AM 12/23/2009, Albert Kaufman wrote:<br>
</font><blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<font face="Verdana" size=3>I just came across this via a Blueoregon
post, and found out that Jim is running for office. Here’s your
secretary. <br><br>
<a href="http://karlockformetro.blogspot.com/">
http://karlockformetro.blogspot.com/</a><br><br>
Thursday, 19 November 2009<br>
Some Policy Talking Points<br>
Neighborhood Density<br><br>
We should stop encouraging density with our laws and tax money. (And quit
zoning farms for housing!) There's a reason that whites flee areas infest
with negroes, illegals and, of course, crime.<br>
<br>
My opponent said that it is necessary to have more density (Mercury
candidate interview)<br>
Cap & Trade Tax on Fossil Fuels<br>
(The price will be MADE TO RISE, WITHOUT LIMIT, UNTIL PEOPLE ARE FORCED
TO CUT BACK USAGE BY 44% )<br><br>
I oppose. It will increase YOUR gasoline cost.<br>
I oppose. It will increase YOUR heating cost<br>
I oppose. It will increase YOUR electric bill<br><br>
<br>
My opponent favors taxs<br>
(Statement to the LWV in spring 2008 and WW interview)<br>
He knows it will increase your cost of energy!<br>
A new tax on energy<br><br>
I oppose. Energy is already too expensive. Drill away. I will not live
long enough to live with the consequences. Most won't. Screw it. Not our
problem.<br><br>
My opponent favors this tax. (WW interview)<br>
Real Estate Sales Tax<br><br>
I oppose. This will make housing cost and rents go up. Over 25s without
children should not vote. It is a duty. What else will hold up real
estate values? "Be fruitful and multiply" God has commanded
it.<br><br>
My opponent favors this tax. (Mercury interview)<br>
Surcharge on income tax<br><br>
I oppose. We are already taxed enough.<br><br>
My opponent favors this tax (if minor and temporary!)<br>
Energy Cost<br><br>
I favor lower energy costs the only way that costs have 2ever fallen - by
increasing supply.<br>
Without access to affordable energy, Americans ... cannot afford to climb
that ladder to success. N. Innis, CORE. Drill downtown Portland, idiots!
Get a clue.<br><br>
My opponent favors Energy Tax and Cap & Trade which will INCREASE
energy cost<br>
Policies that hurt me and my friends.<br><br>
I oppose. We need to protect the vulnerable in our community. They cannot
vote their own interests. That's why we have an education.<br><br>
My opponent's Energy cost increases, housing cost increase hurt the poor
more than they hurt upper income people. He favors these policies.<br>
Secret ballot in union elections<br><br>
Of course elections should be secret ballot! Now, if we could make the
unions have to go secret as well!<br><br>
My opponent opposes the secret ballot.<br><br>
Smart Growth<br>
(tax subsidies to high density, forcing you out of your car by making
driving more expensive and more difficult and , laws to force much higher
neighborhood densities, very dense apartment/condos complexes on bus and
light rail streets.)<br><br>
I oppose. We already have too many skinny houses squeezed in our
neighborhood degrading our neighborhood's livability. All growth is
smart.<br><br>
My opponent favors "smart growth" policies that require tax
subsidies, increased density and making it difficult to drive a car. Cars
first, and people will follow. That's common sense.<br><br>
Diverting School Money to Real Estate Developers<br><br>
I oppose. We must quit diverting any basic services money to
developers.<br><br>
My opponent favors smart growth & high density - Taking money from
basic services is the key funding mechanism that makes these schemes work
Gentrification - high housing costs. I am opposed to all "smart
growth".<br><br>
I oppose. Government policies that encourage high density and
gentrification.<br><br>
My opponent favors smart growth & high density - which cause a large
part of gentrification and high housing costs.<br>
Posted by James Karlock at 10:51<br>
1 comments:</font></blockquote></body>
</html>